<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Say YES to a newspaper bailout!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.acouplethings.com/blog/2008/12/say-yes-to-a-newspaper-bailout/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.acouplethings.com/blog/2008/12/say-yes-to-a-newspaper-bailout/</link>
	<description>A couple things about politics, sports, travel, and other stuff.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 02:18:37 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Scholar in Training</title>
		<link>http://www.acouplethings.com/blog/2008/12/say-yes-to-a-newspaper-bailout/comment-page-1/#comment-2846</link>
		<dc:creator>Scholar in Training</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 20:38:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.acouplethings.com/blog/?p=2860#comment-2846</guid>
		<description>Now you&#039;re saying something interesting. But upon what do you base this?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Now you&#8217;re saying something interesting. But upon what do you base this?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Yankees Fan</title>
		<link>http://www.acouplethings.com/blog/2008/12/say-yes-to-a-newspaper-bailout/comment-page-1/#comment-2843</link>
		<dc:creator>Yankees Fan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 20:33:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.acouplethings.com/blog/?p=2860#comment-2843</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not so sure that bailing out some enterprises and not others is all that constitutional.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not so sure that bailing out some enterprises and not others is all that constitutional.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scholar in Training</title>
		<link>http://www.acouplethings.com/blog/2008/12/say-yes-to-a-newspaper-bailout/comment-page-1/#comment-2839</link>
		<dc:creator>Scholar in Training</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 18:12:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.acouplethings.com/blog/?p=2860#comment-2839</guid>
		<description>Right, you&#039;d go for the unconstitutional one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Right, you&#8217;d go for the unconstitutional one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Yankees Fan</title>
		<link>http://www.acouplethings.com/blog/2008/12/say-yes-to-a-newspaper-bailout/comment-page-1/#comment-2838</link>
		<dc:creator>Yankees Fan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 18:10:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.acouplethings.com/blog/?p=2860#comment-2838</guid>
		<description>Right, if its one or the other, I would demonstrate a preference.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Right, if its one or the other, I would demonstrate a preference.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scholar in Training</title>
		<link>http://www.acouplethings.com/blog/2008/12/say-yes-to-a-newspaper-bailout/comment-page-1/#comment-2837</link>
		<dc:creator>Scholar in Training</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 18:06:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.acouplethings.com/blog/?p=2860#comment-2837</guid>
		<description>My question was: &quot;In the scheme of things I’d much prefer my taxpayer money go to saving newspapers than funding churches, for instance. Wouldn’t you?&quot;

And your response: &quot;No.&quot;

That implies to me anyway that you prefer gov&#039;t funding churches over newspapers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My question was: &#8220;In the scheme of things I’d much prefer my taxpayer money go to saving newspapers than funding churches, for instance. Wouldn’t you?&#8221;</p>
<p>And your response: &#8220;No.&#8221;</p>
<p>That implies to me anyway that you prefer gov&#8217;t funding churches over newspapers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Yankees Fan</title>
		<link>http://www.acouplethings.com/blog/2008/12/say-yes-to-a-newspaper-bailout/comment-page-1/#comment-2834</link>
		<dc:creator>Yankees Fan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 17:57:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.acouplethings.com/blog/?p=2860#comment-2834</guid>
		<description>who said i was for Government dollars funding churches...i&#039;m just not for them funding failing enterprises.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>who said i was for Government dollars funding churches&#8230;i&#8217;m just not for them funding failing enterprises.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scholar in Training</title>
		<link>http://www.acouplethings.com/blog/2008/12/say-yes-to-a-newspaper-bailout/comment-page-1/#comment-2831</link>
		<dc:creator>Scholar in Training</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 16:50:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.acouplethings.com/blog/?p=2860#comment-2831</guid>
		<description>Good analysis.

Why am I not surprised you&#039;d be for government dollars funding churches but not newspapers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good analysis.</p>
<p>Why am I not surprised you&#8217;d be for government dollars funding churches but not newspapers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Yankees Fan</title>
		<link>http://www.acouplethings.com/blog/2008/12/say-yes-to-a-newspaper-bailout/comment-page-1/#comment-2830</link>
		<dc:creator>Yankees Fan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 16:49:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.acouplethings.com/blog/?p=2860#comment-2830</guid>
		<description>No.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scholar in Training</title>
		<link>http://www.acouplethings.com/blog/2008/12/say-yes-to-a-newspaper-bailout/comment-page-1/#comment-2829</link>
		<dc:creator>Scholar in Training</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 16:13:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.acouplethings.com/blog/?p=2860#comment-2829</guid>
		<description>Why not subsidize quaintness? In the scheme of things I&#039;d much prefer my taxpayer money go to saving newspapers than funding churches, for instance. Wouldn&#039;t you?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why not subsidize quaintness? In the scheme of things I&#8217;d much prefer my taxpayer money go to saving newspapers than funding churches, for instance. Wouldn&#8217;t you?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rex Green</title>
		<link>http://www.acouplethings.com/blog/2008/12/say-yes-to-a-newspaper-bailout/comment-page-1/#comment-2828</link>
		<dc:creator>Rex Green</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 16:05:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.acouplethings.com/blog/?p=2860#comment-2828</guid>
		<description>WHY are newspapers failing? 
-- Is it because readers have found alternative sources of news? (a very likely contributor) 
-- Is it because subscribers are dropping due to hard times? (possibly, but newspapers are pretty low cost, relatively speaking) 
-- Is it because subscribers are leaving in disgust over reporting bias? (likely, although those numbers are probably relatively low) 
-- Is it because Gen Y (or whatever young people are called nowadays ;-) is not replacing older subscribers because they don&#039;t have the time or patience for sitting down to read through a big bulky paper? (certainly a strong possibility)
In any case, none of the above reasons makes the papers deserving of a *bailout* at MY expense! It&#039;s been said, why subsidize quaintness? I agree. Let them roll with the punches like any business. There are certainly not a critical industry.  YMMV ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WHY are newspapers failing?<br />
&#8211; Is it because readers have found alternative sources of news? (a very likely contributor)<br />
&#8211; Is it because subscribers are dropping due to hard times? (possibly, but newspapers are pretty low cost, relatively speaking)<br />
&#8211; Is it because subscribers are leaving in disgust over reporting bias? (likely, although those numbers are probably relatively low)<br />
&#8211; Is it because Gen Y (or whatever young people are called nowadays <img src='http://www.acouplethings.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' />  is not replacing older subscribers because they don&#8217;t have the time or patience for sitting down to read through a big bulky paper? (certainly a strong possibility)<br />
In any case, none of the above reasons makes the papers deserving of a *bailout* at MY expense! It&#8217;s been said, why subsidize quaintness? I agree. Let them roll with the punches like any business. There are certainly not a critical industry.  YMMV <img src='http://www.acouplethings.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
